Sunday, August 21, 2011

HISTORY OF THE SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page.
It needs additional references or sources for verification. Tagged since December 2007.
It may contain original research or unverifiable claims. Tagged since December 2007.
Its tone or style may not reflect the formal tone used on Wikipedia. Tagged since December 2007.
It is written like a personal reflection or essay and may require cleanup. Tagged since December 2007.
The History of the Singapore Police Force is a long one, and in many ways, has paralleled the astronomical economic growth of the country the force is tasked to protect. From a staff of eleven men based in a simple attap hut, the force has grown to over 36,000 men and women, basing their operations from thirty-two Neighbourhood Police Centres, sixty Neighbourhood Police Posts, and various other land and marine establishments spread across the country.
[edit]Early years

The Singapore Police Force has a heritage almost as old as that of modern Singapore, having been formed in 1819 with a skeleton force of 11 men under the command of Francis James Bernard, son-in-law of William Farquhar. With no background nor knowledge on policing, Bernard had to work from scratch, as well as occasionally turning to Farquhar for help. In addition, he held multiple roles as magistrate, chief jailer, harbour master, marine storekeeper, as well as personal assistants to Farquhar.
Despite these constraints, Bernard managed to establish the force by recruiting a jemadar (Asian sergeant), eight peons (patrolmen), a jailer, and a Malay writer, kept in operation by a monthly budget of $300. It is likely that some of these men were recruited from amongst the Indian sepoys brought to the settlement by its founder, Sir Stamford Raffles. Manpower constraints meant that the men had to perform a wide range of roles, and required the help of headmen amongst the various ethnic communities to maintain orderliness on the streets, all the more possible as the communities lived in segregated areas around the city.
This partnership with the community was in line with Raffles's vision of a thriving colony largely self-regulated by local social structures, with the British masters administrating it via indirect rule. The large influx of migrants from China, however, began to test this system when the hands-off approach by the British allowed Secret societies in Singapore to thrive. Although originally formed with legal intentions of community bonding and the provision of assistance to fellow migrants, these societies gradually became influential, competitive, and increasingly engaged in illegal activities including monetary extortion from the masses, the operation of gambling dens, and the smuggling of illegal goods on top of more legal commercial operations to meet their financial needs.
Competition gradually heated up between large rival factions, such as that between the larger Ghee Hin Kongsi, the Ghee Hock Kongsi and the Han San Kongsi. Murders, mass riots, kidnappings, arson and other serious crimes became commonplace in the four decades after the colony's founding. Faced with violent acts of crime which may involve thousands, such as the Funeral riots in 1846 involving 9000 members from the Ghee Hin and Ghee Hock secret societies, the police force was woefully incapable of bringing the situation under control, and often had to call in the army for assistance. The escalating number of serious crimes prompted the need for stronger legislation to deter would-be criminals. Singapore's first executions were thus held in the wake of the first criminal session in June 1828, when a Chinese and Indian were found guilty and convicted for murder.
Headed by Europeans and predominantly staffed by Malay and Indian officers, the force had little Chinese representation as the military and policing professionals were traditionally shunned by the Chinese community, which therefore impaired policing efforts amongst the large Chinese populace. In 1843, the force consisted of a sitting magistrate doubling as a superintendent, three European constables and an assistant native constable, fourteen officers and 110 policemen. With a total strength of no more than 150 men, the force was compelled to avoid direct intervention in these mass acts of violence, or risk almost total annihilation.
A repeat of this scenario occurred in 1851, when lingering displeasure against Roman Catholic ethnic Chinese erupted into major rioting leaving over 500 Chinese dead. The army was called in again, although it involved having to induct Indian convicts into military service almost overnight. In 1854, twelve consecutive days of violence sparked by a dispute between the Hokkiens and Teochews disrupted trade. This particular incident led to the formation of the military's Singapore Rifle Corps on 8 July 1854, the earliest predecessor of the Singapore Armed Forces' People's Defence Force today.
Criminal violence was not merely in the domain of the ethnic Chinese, however. Rivalries between Malay princes and communities also often result in acts of violence, which prompted the passing of Singapore's first arms law in March 1823 restricting the right to bear arms to twenty-four of the Malay Sultan's followers. Nearly two centuries later, these anti-arms laws continue to be strictly enforced, resulting in a society relatively free from firearms-related criminal offences.
[edit]References


This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate. (December 2007)
"In the Service of the Nation", John Drysdale, Federal Publications, 1985 ISBN 9971-4-0703-5
"Phoenix: the story of the Home Team ", Felix Soh, Times Editions, 2003 ISBN 981-232-637-5
"Policing Singapore in the 19th & 20th centuries", Peer M. Akbur, Singapore Police Force, 2002 ISBN 981-04-7024-X
[hide]v · d · eSingapore Police Force
Awards and decorations · Establishments and installations · History · Uniforms

Headquarters
Ministry of Home Affairs · Commissioner of Police · Deputy Commissioner of Police

Departments
Administration and Finance · Commercial Affairs · Criminal Investigation · Manpower · Operations · Planning and Organisation · Police Custodial · Police Intelligence · Police Logistics · Police National Service · Police Technology · Public Affairs · Security Industry Regulatory · Service Development and Inspectorate · Volunteer Special Constabulary · Training Command
Line units
Airport Police Division · Ang Mo Kio Police Division · Bedok Police Division · Central Police Division · Clementi Police Division · Gurkha Contingent · Jurong Police Division · Police Coast Guard · Public Transport Security Command · Security Command · Special Operations Command (Crisis Negotiation Unit · Police K-9 Unit · Police National Service Full-time Light Strike Force · Police National Service Key Installation Protection Unit · Police Tactical Unit · Special Tactics and Rescue) · Tanglin Police Division · Traffic Police
Establishments
Home Team Academy · Mount Vernon Camp · Neighbourhood Police Centre · Neighbourhood Police Post · New Phoenix Park · Old Hill Street Police Station · Police Cantonment Complex · Queensway Base
Defunct
Old Police Academy · Geylang Police Division · Toa Payoh Police Division
Commercial and Industrial Security Corporation · Crimewatch · Fast Response Car · Fast Response Vehicle · National Police Cadet Corps · Police Life · Officers killed in the line of duty
View page ratings
Rate this page
What's this?
Trustworthy
Objective
Complete
Well-written
I am highly knowledgeable about this topic (optional)

Submit ratings
Categories: Singapore Police Force | History of Singapore | Law enforcement history
Log in / create accountArticleDiscussionReadEditView history

No comments:

Post a Comment